Your cart is currently empty!
saypro buy occupational trainer training material 97154
You must be logged in to post a review.
Description
PURPOSE AND RATIONALE OF THE QUALIFICATION |
Purpose: The purpose of this qualification is to prepare a learner to: Plan, prepare for, coordinate, implement and evaluate learning programmes to achieve occupational trainee competence. A qualified learner will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL): RPL for access to the external integrated summative assessment: Accredited providers and approved workplaces must apply the internal assessment criteria specified in the related curriculum document to establish and confirm prior learning. Accredited providers and workplaces must confirm prior learning by issuing a statement of result or certifying a work experience record. RPL for access to the qualification: Entry Requirements: |
RECOGNISE PREVIOUS LEARNING? |
Y |
QUALIFICATION RULES |
This qualification is made up of the following compulsory Knowledge and Practical Skill Modules: Knowledge Modules:
|
EXIT LEVEL OUTCOMES |
1. Establish the profile, special needs and barriers to learning of learners within the specified requirements of the training programme 2. Prepare, adapt and align learning materials and resources for a training intervention in the workplace 3. Deliver training, evaluate and report on a learning intervention in the workplace. 4. Gather evidence and make assessment decisions using given assessment tools. |
ASSOCIATED ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1:
|
INTERNATIONAL COMPARABILITY |
Certification systems for vocational qualifications are not static structures but reflect the complex history of the development of technical vocational education and training (TVET) in each country. They also respond to current economic and technological needs and trends. While it appears possible to make generalised comparisons on occupational qualifications in several countries or progression routes to qualified occupational trainer status, it is quite a different matter to base the comparison on what is being taught, how the teaching is taking place and how the students are being assessed. Largely, this difficulty is driven by disparities in the transformation taking place in the advanced industrial countries and its consequences on employment and work patterns, technology and production processes, and subsequently training needs. Nonetheless, it is quite apparent that pioneer nations such as Germany and Australia amongst others, have developed teacher training systems that have become widely accepted benchmarks. On the other hand it is quite erroneous – but possible – to compare these systems to the hereby proposed Occupational Trainer curriculum; mainly because the function of the occupational trainer often does not have any equivalent in qualification regulatory framework of these countries. It is normally a function carried out by a qualified and extensively experienced employee on a voluntary basis or as appointed by the employer. Often, national frameworks only refer to guidelines that govern workplace trainer educational requirements and follow the conventional adult educator routes and not a specialised curriculum in workplace-based and technical education. When researching the occupational trainer pathway and role, international frameworks point to courses with similar outcomes as the occupational trainer qualification but not necessarily same target group. Furthermore, due to the common distinctions drawn between Initial Vocational Education and Training (IVET), and Continuing Vocational Education and Training (CVET) in dual-systems prevalent in most nations, no generalised training frameworks and qualifications exist for occupational trainers. IVET – as institutionally based practical workplace preparation system – as opposed to CVET, which is work based, has a more pronounced teacher qualification framework and is the ambit of professional teacher training institutions. On the contrary, occupational trainers fall in the CVET category which has a less regulated framework which feeds off the general teacher-training requirements outlined for IVET practitioners. It is against this backdrop that, an international comparison of occupational trainer qualification has to be placed within the general educator-facilitator scope. Germany: Detailed comparison:
|
ARTICULATION OPTIONS |
This is an occupational/ technical related qualification and is applicable to the OQSF. This qualification is part of a suite of qualifications within the OQSF and will in future articulate to the following qualifications, currently under development:
|
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.
You must be logged in to post a review.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.